Page 8 - JRCERT Update Articles
P. 8

JRCERT Update








          a range of inconsistencies, most projects had a single   top-down managerial approach, as is often the case,
          iteration, failed completely, or both.  If optimally used,   but by identifying leaders throughout all levels of the
                                       23
          PDSA has the capability to truly implement the scien-  system and actively engaging them in a well-organized
          tific method as a process for change.              change process.

          Discussion
            Given the mutuality of radiology and innovation,    Melissa A Davis, MD, serves on the Joint Review
          it is imperative that radiologists understand how to   Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology board of
          approach change in their organizations in a thought-  directors and is associate professor and vice chair of medical
          ful and systematic manner. With changes in payment   informatics in the Department of Radiology and Biomedical
          structures and enhanced computing capability, radi-  Imaging at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven,
          ology needs to be proactive, rather than reactive, to   Connecticut.
          change. The way to do this is by understanding how    James V Rawson, MD, is vice chair of operations and
          change happens and ways to guide it effectively.   special projects in the Department of Radiology at Beth
            Often overlooked in change management at the     Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts.
          organizational level are the individuals in that organiza-
          tion and an understanding of the social structure and   References
          network that are needed to implement a change process.   1.   Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Keeler EB. Costs and Benefits of Health
          The transtheoretical and diffusion of innovation mod-  Information Technology. U.S. Department of Health and Human
          els can help leaders reveal who in their organization   Services; 2006.
          is moving toward the change sought and who is not.   2.   Zheng K, Haftel HM, Hirschl RB, O’Reilly M, Hanauer DA.
                                                                 Quantifying the impact of health IT implementations on clinical
          The transtheoretical model can further identify which   workflow: a new methodological perspective. J Am Med Inform
          stage an individual or group is in and strategize ways   Assoc. 2010;17(4):454-461. doi:10.1136/jamia.2010.004440
          to increase exposure and education about the desired   3.   Chockley K, Emanuel E. The end of radiology? Three threats to
          outcome; for example, the model can help identify who   the future practice of radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(12 Pt
          is in the precontemplation phase and devise ways to    A):1415-1420. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.07.010
          move toward the next step and ultimately to action. The   4.   Fleishon H, Muroff LR, Patel SS. Change management for radi-
                                                                 ologists. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(9):1229-1233. doi:10.1016
          diffusion of innovation model can help identify change   /j.jacr.2017.02.053
          agents and opinion leaders in an organization, which   5.   Kim CS, Spahlinger DA, Kin JM, Billi JE. Lean health care:
          can be used strategically to disseminate change every-  what can hospitals learn from a world-class automaker? J Hosp
          where. Although these models focus on the types of     Med. 2006;1(3):191-199. doi:10.1002/jhm.68
          individuals involved in making positive improvements,   6.   Brookes E. Transtheoretical model: stages of health behavior
                                                                 change. SimplyPsychology. Updated November 9, 2023. https://
          the PDSA model puts a scientific framework around      www.simplypsychology.org/transtheoretical-model.html
          change and allows for data collection and tracking of   7.   Rakowski W, Dube AC, Goldstein MG. Considerations for
          progress through several iterative cycles. The authors   extending the transtheoretical model of behavior change
          propose that using these models will affect positive   to screen mammography. Health Educ Res. 1996;11:77-96.
          change for radiology organizations and groups.         doi:10.1093/her/11.1.77
                                                             8.   Armitage CJ. Is there utility in the transtheoretical model?
          Conclusion                                             Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(Pt 2):195-210. doi:10.1348/135
                                                                 910708X368991
            Technologists are constantly faced with new tech-  9.   Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of
          nology and the need to redesign, improve, or replace   health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38-48.
          existing processes. By applying these methods to       doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38
          proposed changes, change management projects can   10.  Prochaska JO. Decision making in the transtheoretical model
          be implemented successfully and benefit long-term      of behavior change. Med Decis Making. 2008;28(6):845-849.
                                                                 doi:10.1177/0272989X08327068
          patient care and quality. This is not completed with a   11.  Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H. Improving



          RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, January/February 2024, Volume 95, Number 3                               233
          Reprinted with permission from the American Society of Radiologic Technologists for educational purposes. ©2023. All rights reserved.
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13